Dividends for children in Poland !


1. Programme called “500+”
embraces 3,82 million children until 18 year of age that is 55% of all children
in this age range. Every second and next child receives 500 zloty a month with
no conditions. Money are free of tax and seizure.
2. Programme concerns every second and next
child in family. For the first child net income per member of family cannot
exceed 800 zloty to receive benefits (500 zloty).
3. Poland spends on this programme 23
billion zloty a year. All national expenses total: is 850 billion zloty.
4. Results of programme:
– drop of 10% of people using social help
and food help
– poverty dropped of 48%, and extreme
poverty of 94%
– from November 2016 increased the number
of newborn children of 14%. In 2016 was born 16 thousand children more than in
2015. In 2017 is expected growth of 25-35 thousands children
– parents spend more time with children
(increase of 14%)
– improve of relations in marriages (of

– some of the women resigned from jobs to
stay at home with the children  

ruling party bets on child subsidy to prop up support

By Justyna Pawlak and Tadeusz Kolasinski | WARSAW
Poland’s conservative
government is betting on a new child subsidy to prop up its ratings and boost
confidence in the European Union’s sixth largest economy.
Opinion polls suggest
the 500+ subsidy, introduced in April and named after the monthly 500 zlotys
($126) per child it offers, is proving popular for the governing Law and
Justice (PiS) party as it battles accusations of undermining democracy.
But some women’s
groups and opponents say it reinforces an outdated, stereotypical image of
women and helps the PiS divert attention from the charges that it has ridden
roughshod over the rule of law by trying to shackle the constitutional court.
Monika Rybicka, a
25-year-old mother of two, is a beneficiary of the 500+ subsidy, an important
part of the PiS’ successful election campaign last year. But she also sees
potential pitfalls.
“It’s a good move
by the state. They noticed us and helped us,” said Rybicka, who lives with
her baby twins in social housing in the small town of Wyszkow, about 60 km (37
miles) northeast of Warsaw.
She says the
additional 1,000 zlotys she receives each month, in a country were the average
wage is 4,250 zlotys per month, is a “huge help” and she can now
afford better things.
But Rybicka, who was
unemployed before she gave birth, acknowledges the subsidy is high enough to
discourage some mothers, especially those who are poorly paid or out of work,
from seeking a job or returning to their former workplace.
“If you have two
children and you earn 1,500 zlotys (a month) then you can quit your job, take
the subsidy and stay at home,” she said.
“You can save
money by staying at home. Day care is costly. So you can stay at home and maybe
make some money under the table.”
The child subsidy is
meant to help 2.7 million families in the country of 38 million people which
shook off communist rule in 1989 and joined the European Union in 2004.
Economists say it is
expected to bolster the economy by fuelling consumption, at least in the short
It was followed this
month by another important move to boost the economy — a shake-up of the
pension system which economists say will help finance welfare spending.
A report by
PriceWaterhouseCoopers showed Poland offers the highest child subsidy of any
central and eastern European country in the EU. But it is less than in France,
which offers 130-167 euros ($144-185) per month, Ireland, which provides 135
euros, and Germany, where the subsidy is 184–215 euros.
Employers’ groups,
recruiters and unemployment officials say the number of mothers from poorer
families quitting their jobs has grown since the subsidy was launched.
“We estimate that
as many as 200,000 to 250,000 people may leave the workforce because of the
subsidy,” said Krzysztof Inglot of the human resources company WorkService
based in southwestern Poland.
He said that receiving
a subsidy for two children gave women “a logically perfect argument”
to give up work, stay at home and save on childcare. This worries opponents of
the PiS’ drive toward a more conservative society.
“A woman’s role
is tied to her job as a mother in the PiS thinking,” said Malgorzata
Druciarek of the liberal Institute of Public Affairs think tank. “Giving women
direct payments (for children) bolsters this stereotype.”
The Congress of Women,
a women’s lobby group, has said the proposal will discourage women from working
and therefore hit their pensions.
The new subsidy is
part of efforts by PiS to carry out promises it made in last October’s
parliamentary election to provide more economic fairness and revive national
It also coincides with
its policy of promoting traditional values in the predominantly Roman Catholic
country and attempts to increase the birth rate to give the economy a lift.
Economists say the
subsidy’s cost is prohibitive at an estimated 23 billion zlotys a year, or just
under half of Poland’s fiscal deficit.
But it is proving
effective for the government. Opinion polls show the PiS’ popularity ratings
are between 35 and 40 percent — around the same level as when it won a
parliamentary election in October with 38 percent of the votes.
The subsidy appeals —
and is especially beneficial — to poorer people in small towns and villages,
the traditional PiS electorate which felt neglected by the centrist Civic
Platform that led Poland from 2007 until October.
The popularity of the
subsidy has made it hard for the opposition to criticize it and has also helped
offset concern and protests over changes to the constitutional court which
critics, including the United States and the EU, say remove checks and balances
on lawmakers, undermining democracy.
“(The subsidy) is
a key factor behind the people’s willingness to vote for PiS even though they
understand what it does is a threat to democracy,” said Aleksander Smolar,
a liberal political analyst who runs the Stefan Batory Foundation.
A poll in April showed
60 percent of Poles are worried about the future of democracy, but another
survey showed Poles have never been more optimistic about their economic
PiS leader Jaroslaw
Kaczynski has blamed recent protests against the government on
“post-communists” resisting change.
“But we have been
able to show a clear prospect for good changes, which will affect many people.
For many, the 500+ subsidy is a concrete change,” he told the rightist
weekly wSieci.
(Additional reporting
by Pawel Sobczak, Marcin Goettig, Wiktor Szary and Jakub Iglewski, Editing by
Timothy Heritage)
This is internet address for this
My comment:
in article is mentioned average wage in
Poland that is 4250 zloty per month. With statistical average wage is like with
statistical number of legs between man and horse: both they have in average 3

70% of the people in Poland earn below the
average wage. Most of the people earn in Poland 2500 zloty brut. 

Bolivie libre des Rothschilds

Evo Morales libère la Bolivie de la banque Rothschild. 

La Bolivie lâche une Bombe : une politique monétaire indépendante est la clé de la souveraineté nationale.

Le président de la Bolivie Evo Morales explique comment son pays a retrouvé sa souveraineté
La Bolivie est l’un des rares pays sur terre ayant encore les « cojones » pour dire les choses telles qu’elles sont.
Nous avons été témoins, le mois dernier, de certaines déclarations pleines de vérité que nous attendions tous quand l’ambassadeur de la Bolivie à l’ONU a déconstruit le charabia de Nikki Haley au Conseil de sécurité: « Maintenant, les Etats-Unis croient qu’ils sont les enquêteurs, qu’ils sont les procureurs, les juges et ils sont les bourreaux … les actions unilatérales sont des actions impérialistes. Les États-Unis ne sont pas intéressés par le droit international; Ils l’ignorent quand il ne leur convient pas ».
Mais c’était juste un tour d’échauffement.
Lors d’un discours prononcé la semaine dernière pour le 10e anniversaire de la Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des autochtones, le président de la Bolivie Evo Morales a averti que les banques « contrôlaient le monde » et a exhorté les pays à rejeter le militarisme des États-Unis et la servitude financière. 
Voici quelques faits saillants:
La crise financière a été générée par les banques. Ce sont elles qui contrôlent le monde. Elles contrôlent le système financier. Elles sont le véritable gouvernement du monde. Il n’y a pas d’élection pour elles, mais elles continuent néanmoins à gouverner.
Il est de mon devoir de vous informer de ce que nous avons réalisé en Bolivie. Grâce à l’éveil des consciences au sein de notre peuple, et des organismes sociaux, nous avons retrouvé notre identité, et par là, notre dignité et notre souveraineté. Nous avons récupéré notre terre et notre espérance. Et nous sommes en train de le transformer en une réalité quotidienne.
Et la Bolivie, avec une grande fierté, est en mesure d’affirmer que, aujourd’hui, nous sommes 100 pour cent alphabétisés.
Nous n’avons pas de bases militaires américaines sur notre territoire. La Bolivie est libre vis-à-vis des fonds monétaires et nous pouvons définir notre propre politique monétaire sans aucune ingérence extérieure.
La Bolivie est libre vis-à-vis des doctrines et des bases militaires étrangères. Il est très important pour nous d’avoir le contrôle de nos propres ressources naturelles.
Ce que nous avons réalisé dans un pays comme le mien est un exemple de ce que nous sommes en mesure de faire au niveau mondial.

 Traduction : Avic – Réseau International

Fraudes électorales en France, suite

Est-ce qu’on pourrait pas refaire le 1er tour des Élections présidentielles avec comme motif : TRICHERIE ?!
Je comprends rien au 23% de Macron? et j’ai pas bien envie de choisir là…

J’ai mis les sources ci-dessous…

Petit changement entre hier et aujourd’hui… les votes blancs à 0 du site du gouvernement ont disparu… et bizarrement presque TOUTES les colonnes ont changés (pas juste l’excuse vote blanc/nul) pour finalement changer encore une fois un peu après que d’autres internautes en aient parlé et juste diviser les nuls entre blancs et nuls.
On retrouve d’autres personnes ayant fait des captures d’écran et même des journaux assurant de ma bonne foie ^^)

le site du gouvernement : http://elections.interieur.gouv.fr/

les contestations :









les pétitions :



Vous pouvez me soutenir sur Tipeee.com, (m’aider à continuer mes vidéos et même participer à l’essor de ma chaîne) : http://www.tipeee.com/kriss

Macron et le complot, alias cabale !

Cabale (sic) de Mondialistes alias Internationalistes ?

…Si c’est là l’accusation, je plaide coupable et j’en suis fier…”

“Depuis plus d’un siècle, des extrémistes politiques de gauche comme de droite se sont emparés d’incidents pour lesquels on a fait beaucoup de battage, comme ma rencontre avec Castro, pour attaquer la famille Rockefeller pour l’influence démesurée qu’ils nous attribuent sur les institutions politiques et économiques américaines. Quelques uns croient même que nous faisons partie d’une cabale secrète travaillant contre les intérêts des Etats-Unis, nous appelant ma famille et moi des “internationalistes” et nous accusant de conspirer avec d’autres pour construire une structure politique et économique globale plus intégrée – un monde uni, si vous voulez. 

Si c’est là l’accusation, je plaide coupable et j’en suis fier.”


“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Qui soutient Macron ?

Cette même cabale, ce complot avoué !

The money trick

It’s time people knew the money trick


Colin Barclay-Smith is an Australian journalist who started studying Douglas’s Social Credit proposals during the first years of the Depression. He was so convinced of the value of this doctrine that he founded, in 1932, a journal to diffuse it, the New Era, which had at one time over 30,000 subscribers. In 1934, Barclay-Smith accompanied Douglas in his tour of Australia and New Zealand. Barclay-Smith died on May 19, 1957 in Sydney, at the age of 64. A brilliant writer, Barclay-Smith wrote several booklets on various aspects of Social Credit. The last one, It’s time they knew, was published a few months before his death. This booklet was republished and updated several times under the title The Money Trick. (This book is available from our office, in English or in Polish, for $9, postage included.) Here are excerpts from this booklet:
by Colin Barclay-Smith
Colin Barclay-SmithColin Barclay-Smith
It’s time the people of Australia knew the alarming facts. Test your own knowledge of these facts by the following questions:
Do you know that no bank lends money deposited with it?
Do you know that when a bank lends money it CREATES it out of nothing?
Do you know that bank loans are merely pen and ink entries in the credit columns of a bank’s ledger? They have no other existence.
Do you know that practically all the money in the community comes into circulation as a debt to the banks?
Do you know that money loaned by a Government bank is just as much a debt to the people as if it were loaned from a private bank?
Do you know that “fixed deposits” are a plausible screen to hide the creation of credit?
Did it ever occur to you that the banks enjoy this unique facility of creating credit and putting the nation progressively into debt-bondage because they create FINANCIAL credit against the REAL credit created by the people?
Do you realize that every time a Government borrows money for a public work, the people are debited with the liability (in perpetuity), but are never credited with the value of the asset?
Do you know that every repayment of a bank loan cancels the amount of the loan out of existence?
Do you know that Treasury Notes are Government I.O.U.’s — national pawn tickets for pledging the assets of the country to the banks for the loan of OUR OWN financial credit?
Do you know that banks purchase bank sites, build premises, and acquire assets at no real cost whatever to themselves — by the simple process of honoring their own checks?
You may dismiss these affirmations as “incredible”, or “absurd”, but if you will read on, each one will be proved beyond all shadow of doubt.
Most of us have grown up with only the vaguest notions of money. We are fairly certain that it is the Government’s right to print notes and mint coins. For the rest, our knowledge is distinctly foggy.
Most people, for example, labor under the impression that the only money in the community is notes, silver, and copper. But this is a very, very small part of the community’s money.
In fact, notes, silver, and copper — legal tender — is used for less than five per cent of the total purchases made. Over 95 per cent of all business is done by checks.
This check currency is really bank-created money — bank credit — but it functions exactly the same as legal tender money. Banking authorities of world-wide repute state that banks can and do create credit up to nine or ten times their cash resources.
Banks go to great pains to perpetuate the fiction that they are merely “the custodians of their customers’ deposits” — that they lend these deposits, and that their profit consists of the difference in the rate of interest which they pay to depositors, and the interest they receive from borrowers. Such an idea is quite wrong, and it is the popular acceptance of this major monetary fallacy which gives rise to most of the false notions upon the subject of money.
 The facts about money are as follows: —
  1. Banks do not lend money deposited with them.
  2. Every bank loan or overdraft is a creation of entirely new money (credit), and is a clear addition to the amount of money in the community.
  3. No depositor’s money is used when a bank lends money.
  4. Practically all the money in the community begins its life as an interest-bearing debt to the banks.

The technique of a bank loan

the money trick

All that a bank does in lending anybody, say $1,000, is to open an account in the borrower’s name — if he hasn’t already got an account — and write Limit: $1,000, across the top of the ledger. The borrower is now free to operate and overdraw on this account to the limit indicated.

 When the account is drawn on the check, and in turn the check is lodged in another account at the same or another bank, a “deposit” is thus created, and the supply of money increased. Thus bank loans create “deposits”, which plainly are not the source of loan money but, rather, the other way around, they are the outcome of loans.

Now for the authorities

Now for the unassailable authorities on this matter of the creation of credit by the banks.
Governor Eccles, a one-time head of the Federal Reserve Bank Board of the United States, said: “The banks can create and destroy money. Bank credit is money. It’s the money we do most of our business with, not with that currency which we usually think of as money.” (Given in evidence before a Congressional Committee)
Mr. R.G. Hawtrey, previously Assistant Under-Secretary to the British Treasury, in his Trade Depression and the Way Out, says: “When a bank lends, it create money out of nothing.”
In his book, The Art of Central Banking, Hawtrey also wrote: “When a bank lends, it creates credit. Against the advance which it enters amongst its assets, there is a deposit entered in its liabilities. But other lenders have not this mystical power of creating the means of payment out of nothing. What they lend must be money that they have acquired through their economic activities.”
Lord Keynes, the economist and one-time Board Member of the Bank of England, states: “There can be no doubt that all deposits are created by the banks.”
Professor Frederick Soddy, the eminent physicist of Oxford University, wrote: “Is it possible in these days of disbelief in physical miracles really to caricature institutions which pretend to lend money, and do not lend it but create it? And when it is repaid them, de-create it? And who have achieved the physically impossible miracle thereby, not only of getting something for nothing, but also of getting perennial interest from it?”

The community’s life blood

The business world cannot function without bank credit, and every person in the community is equally dependent upon it.
Stop, or even restrict, bank overdrafts for one week, and there would be a nation-wide crisis. Continue the restriction for three months, and this nation would be plunged into a depression, with unemployment and bankruptcy for thousands.
Such a crisis happened in the early thirties, as millions of the older generation remember with sorrow and bitterness. You may remember that during the Depression, there was no shortage of goods. The shops and stores were full. But credit had been restricted by the banks. The life blood did not flow freely, and industry died, and unemployment was staggering.
Bank credit is the life blood of the community, and if the flow of blood is restricted, the patient’s life is jeopardized.

How money begins

Now let us look at this credit business a little more closely. How does it come about?
 There is an old economic tag that money originates in production, and is cancelled in consumption. Practically all the community’s money has its roots in production. Most money sees the light of day as a “producer credit”. In other words, it begins its life as a debt to a bank, and from the moment it is released as a book entry in a bank’s ledger, the credit created by the bank and loaned to a company or individual travels through the production system, much of it being used for consumption, and is finally cancelled when the debt is repaid to the bank by the borrower.
That industry — both primary and secondary — cannot function on its own resources which is proven by the universal need it has of bank overdraft accommodation (i.e., bank loans).

A nation in pawn

Interest money lending

In other words, this huge total of assets is in pawn to the banks, and in the event of any individual or company defaulting in its loan obligations, the individual or the firm would probably be put into liquidation in satisfaction of the banks’ claims.

That’s fair enough, you might say. But wait. The banks lend money against the assets of the community. These assets were created by the total efforts of the community. They were created by the resources of enterprising individuals, skilled executives, and adventurous management, in producing articles or services to satisfy a public need.
The banks made no contribution whatever to the development of a farm, a business, or a manufacturing company in its early formative years. The bank comes into the picture when most of the hard pioneering work is done, and by granting a loan — a costless and effortless procedure — it merely monetizes the READ CREDIT created by a functioning industry and a consuming public.
In other words, the banks merely create — by the stroke of a pen, mark you, or figures in a bank ledger — the financial credit which is backed by the real credit created by the joint operations of producers and consumers. The people do all the work and run all the risks. The bank does nothing — nothing to create the assets — and runs no risk whatever with the credit it lends.
Real credit may be defined as the faith or belief (credo, I believe) that a free community has the knowledge, energy, and capacity to co-operate in satisfying its needs. This is its power in association, and the end product is the sum total of the community’s real credit.
We see, therefore, that the real credit of a nation is created by the people through their abundant and many-sided energies — what economic textbooks refer to as “the increment of association”.
Now, the financial credit of a nation should be a reasonably correct reflection of its real credit. Since money is merely a convenient token system to enable the people to purchase goods and services, it should be issued at the same rate that goods and services are produced, neither more nor less.

Cuckoos in the nest

 But even more important is this point: Since the community creates all real credit, the ownership of the financial credit which should reflect the real credit — the goods and services — also belongs to the people. But it doesn’t! It belongs to the banks! Or rather, it has been appropriated by the banks.
The banks are really financial cuckoos in the community’s nest. The banks issue and cancel money without any regard to the total production of goods and services. They cancel financial credit arbitrarily, unscientifically, sometimes causing deflation and depression.
 As we go on, we shall see that the ownership of the real credit of the community is the great issue that must be solved if Australia — and all nations which work under the same monetary system — is to survive as a free democracy or as a slave state.
Today, the banks enjoy a monopoly of the public credit. They create and cancel (destroy) money as though the real credit was created by them. Whereas they haven’t lifted a little finger in its creation.
But by usurping the nation’s sovereign prerogative to issue all its monetary requirements — not merely the small change (the legal tender) — the banks have established a powerful monopoly of credit by which they wield the greatest power without any responsibility whatsoever.
This monopoly of credit by the banks is not new. It has been going on for over 100 years, and during that time, the banks have consolidated their position to one of almost unassailable power.

The power of life and death

It charges interest upon this credit creation, and when the loan is repaid, both the debt and the money used in payment of the debt are automatically cancelled. (Their cancellation, of course, does not apply to any cash or legal tender used in the repayment of the bank’s loan, but legal tender usually represents no more than a very small percentage of bank transactions.)
The banks have the power to call up the overdraft partly or wholly at any time they decide. The fate of companies and individuals — and governments — is entirely at their mercy. Their power is stupendous, both in the creating and granting of loans, and in their arbitrary recall, with or without notice!
The banks give, and the banks taketh away. They hold the power of life and death over the whole economy.

Man creates a Frankenstein: taxation

The lengthened shadow of debt is taxation. As debt waxes fat with every loan, so taxation casts a larger shadow and a deeper gloom over the lives and liberties of the people. Debt is what governments sow. Taxation is the bitter harvest the people reap.
Taxation reduces the living standard of every man, woman and child, and is therefore a frontal attack, backed by all the sanctions of the State, on the personal freedom of the individual.
As practically all money issued has its origin in interest-bearing debt, it follows that all forms of taxation must increase, inevitably, mathematically, and remorselessly. As taxation increases, so individual security decreases.
It is not so very long ago since taxation was a puling infant. But what an alarming change twenty or thirty years has wrought! The child has grown to a man, and the man has become a conscienceless thug who forces his way into every home, grabs what he can with impunity, and waylays rich and poor alike.
The taxation tug is the terror of the neighbourhood, holding the whole community to ransom. And the irony of the situation is it is no use calling the police, for the police, and all the sanctions of the State, are his aiders and abettors.

What if water was issued as a debt?

Does it not occur to you as preposterous that private institutions — as private as a butcher’s shop or a chain store — should have the sole right to create and issue money as a debt, thus making tax bondage inevitable?
Just imagine if the Water Board issued all water for human requirement as an interest-bearing debt, and that, in order to meet our interest obligations on the water we used, we had to go back to the Water Board to borrow more water to pay the Board for the water we had already used. What a fantastic situation! And yet, that is precisely what the banks do with money. They monopolize its creation, issue it only as a debt, and oblige us to go back to the same polluted source — the only source — to borrow the money to pay interest on the debt already incurred!

Social evils of the system

It is the most tragic irony of our civilization today that although man has solved the age-old problem of dire poverty and scarcity, although his inventive genius has given the world an age of plenty, we have become individually more and more enmeshed in the heavy chains of debt. Progress has been purchased by tax bondage — and quite needlessly.
Instead of being more free, man is enfettered. Instead of enjoying better health with shorter hours, labor-saving devices, and social services, many diseases, and especially diseases of the nervous system, are more widespread then ever before.

Automation will cripple taxpayers

We have dwelt at some length on confiscatory taxation and the social evils it spawns. But worse is to come. There is on the horizon a dark cloud slowly but surely assuming menacing proportions. We refer to automation.
Don’t misunderstand us. Automation is inevitable. It will quicken the tempo of change in lifting the burden of monotonous types of work from the backs of men to the backs of electronic, manless machines. Automation will put the coping stone on this age of plenty by increasing the plenty, and do it with less and less human effort.
But let us be under no illusions. Where labor-saving inventions in the past have meant a steady reduction of working hours, automation will mean a steady reduction of working men — and women.
By that time — the next five or ten years — the taxation load will have grown very much heavier, and the number of taxpayers to carry the onerous burden will have grown fewer. If now taxpayers are at the staggering point, automation will bring the declining number of taxpayers to the point of complete collapse.
If the people displaced by automation are to live, and live as this age of plenty entitles them to live, whether employed or not, then it becomes even more imperative for the Government to assert and exercise its sovereign prerogative to create its monetary requirements instead of borrowing them. It must become master in its own house if all the stupendous problems that are now taking grotesque and frightening shape are to be resolved in sanity and common sense.
The money-creation and debt story is the same all over. Nations are now wallowing in crisis, through a sea of debt and usury.
Colin Barclay-Smith

Posted in Social Credit

Invitations 2017
In English



Les “amis” de Macron

Images intégrées 1


Plus au sujet d’ Emmanuel Macron

Nous publions ici des documents qui ne devaient pas être portés à la connaissance du public. Ces documents prouvent la perfidie des gens de la Haute Finance, notamment leur complot pour prendre tout le pouvoir. Ceci avec la complicité active des politiciens, des journalistes, et la soumission pathétique d’une grande partie des Français eux-mêmes…
Nous sommes dépassés par toutes vos réactions positives, aussi, nous ne pouvons pas répondre à tous, désolés.
L’heure étant d’une extrême gravité, il faut diffuser l’info massivement. Vous êtes autorisés à reprendre cette vidéo par tous les moyens, et même celle-ci :



Trucage des élections présidentielles


L’ex associé-gérand chez Rothschild & Co, E. Macron est-il complice du détournement de 80 milliards d’euros par an, au détriment de la France ?
Ce que nous vous présentons-là, c’est vraiment du lourd. Nous montrons que non seulement en mettant Macron à la tête de l’État, les Français se ridiculisent à la face du Monde, mais qu’ils valident une spoliation patente.
Voici un document fort, encadré par d’autres, dont ce premier, d’un banquier suisse repenti…
Pour voir tout le premier document de 35 mn :
Il va peut-être falloir que l’intéressé s’explique… Car s’il faut « penser printemps », comme il dit, il faudrait aussi penser à rendre des comptes… Oui, mais alors, VITE !
A voir aussi : Le coup d’État de la Haute Finance avec l’Opération Macron – Révélations explosives
https://youtu.be/K2HkPpuYyjQ (40 mn)
Nos 2 chaînes YouTube :

https://youtu.be/sHZo84XzAXM (8 13)

Ce que nous vous présentons est une véritable bombe ! En premier, c’est un document qui remonte au début de 2012. L’ensemble démontre qu’il y a bien un complot de la Haute Finance depuis au moins cette date, pour imposer Macron. Ils veulent à présent tout le pouvoir politique, en plus du pouvoir économique, pour finaliser l’avènement du Nouvel Ordre Mondial. Macron est là pour achever le (droit du) travail, sous les ordres de la Haute Finance, pour une Haute Trahison de la France et des Français…
Macron ciblé par la CIA ?
Voir aussi Le coup d’État de la Haute Finance :


Mobilisation générale: épargnes, retraites…  volées légalement ! 



Donner à chacun ce qui lui est dû par un dividende social à tous!

à faire circuler largement, merci, le monde est déjà meilleur grâce à ce simple geste de solidarité.

Les visiteurs peuvent désormais consulter mon blog via une connexion chiffrée en se rendant sur https://desiebenthal.blogspot.com.

Invitations 2017
In English

en français:

Avec mes meilleures salutations

Nouvelle adresse: 23, Av. Edouard Dapples, CH 1006 LAUSANNE. SUISSE

Tél: international ++ 41 21 616 88 88

Traduction »