RiE 3, plein d’impôts ou monnaie-pleine !

Avec monnaie-pleine et ses avenants, plus besoin d’impôts.

faible production = peu d’argent,

production moyenne = production moyenne d’argent, 

production abondante = argent abondant, 

production automatique = argent automatique.

Le vrai problème, se distribuer les produits surabondants grâce aux robots de plus en plus nombreux et efficaces.

On finance des guerres avec des milliers de milliards, pourquoi pas la paix avec quelques centaines de milliards ?

Wallace Klinck
August 24, 2016 at 8:42 am Permalink
Mark has identified the weakness of the various current proposals for a guaranteed basic income, such as that recently rejected by voters in Switzerland. The problem is that such programs are simply not financially viable because they are essentially demands for a massive redistribution of incomes via taxation. This suggests implicitly that the price system is balanced and it is upon this false assumption that such programs fail and have not been implemented in any general way.
As Mark has pointed out, the Social Credit approach proceeds from the proven fact that the price-system is not self-liquidating, i.e., that it produces financial costs and prices at an increasing rate of flow relative to the rate that it distributes effective consumer income. As the economy modernizes and non-labour costs continue to comprise an ever larger component of price relative to income generating costs, i.e., wages, salaries and dividends, the deficiency of effective consumer buying power become increasingly larger.
Obviously, the economy could not function without some intervening factor. That factor is primarily expanding financial debt whereby the banking system creates vast and expanding volumes of money as credit, i.e., debt, to allow the goods of industry to be purchased. Of course when they are purchased the consumers depart with their money and business returns it to the bank to settle its original production loan, and the bank cancels this money out of existence–just as it created in the first place by issuing it as a loan. The critical point to note is that this does not end the matter. Consumers may have access to the goods but they are now indebted to the banks and must repay these loans over a period of years and the repayments can only be made by the inflationary process of extracting the required money from future cycles of production. For the privilege of living today we are forced to mortgage our future. This make no realistic sense because the physical costs of production are met as the production occurs and are fully met when goods are completed and ready for market. This reveals a serious cost-accountancy error in the existing financial price-system which is revealed to be non- self-liquidating or incapable of liquidating the costs of production without drawing increasingly on future incomes. What is required is an external source of income that cancels financial costs without being issued as debt and creating new costs as current financial practice wrongly requires.
Thus what is required is that the monopoly of credit creation held by the banks must be broken by an extraneous injection of consumer purchasing-power that is not issued as debt but is effective consumer buying power capable of finally liquidating the costs of production without leaving a trail of debt to be worked out of the future. The deficiency of purchasing-power cannot be solved by any re-distribution of existing incomes. What is required is a distribution of additional purchasing-power which allows consumer access to produced goods, permits business to recover it costs from sales–and does so without any residual debt in the community. The banks are presently creating new money to function as purchasing power but the great injustice is that they claim ownership of this money which they issue to monetize the community’s wealth–wealth which they do not create! The money which they create belongs to the community and should be credited to the community. In effect under current arrangements the banks have in effect appropriated the communal credit–which must be restored to the community. How is this best to be accomplished?
The appropriate manner by which to effect this restoration is to have prepared a National Credit Account, being an actuarially determined estimate of the “real credit” of the nation, i.e., the ability to deliver goods and services as, when and where required or desired. This would include all natural and human resources which might be available for production and which might result in prices if so employed. This NCA would always be growing as the value of new capital assets was credited to it. Money should be drawn from this NCA to finance: (1) the payment of National Consumer Dividends to all citizens as an inalienable inheritance and (2) payments to retailers at point of sale, enabling them to institute Compensated Retail Prices, i.e., to reduce the price of their products by a universal discount factor determined by the ratio of national consumption to national production in any designated costing cycle. The monopoly of the banks to create credit must be broken, the ownership of credit must be restored to the community, the price-system must be balanced and prices must be reduced so realistically to reflect the enormous increases in real efficiency which the modern technological economy is regularly achieving. We can thus be freed from the tyranny of the perpetual Work State and enjoy increasing leisure in the context of economic security. Because nations would no longer be under duress to export more goods than they export in a futile and increasingly competitive effort to compensate their internal deficiencies of purchasing-power, the major cause of war would be eliminated.