Common Law Rule Against Perpetuities, is a very strong principle superior to most other laws,  which limits the duration
of trusts to no more than 99 years.

South Dakota passed a state statute
abolishing the rule, thereby allowing trusts to be established in
perpetuity. “Many states have not repealed this common law principle
and are therefore not even considered for the dynasty trust business,”
which helps families manage multigenerational wealth.

New York State and City still has this Common Law Rule Against Perpetuities. The FED in New York is submitted to this Common Law Rule Against Perpetuities.
http://blog.ceb.com/2011/07/20/rule-against-perpetuities-is-still-relevant/

FED…please, see the end of the page 4 with the link just below, i.e. FED has ended end of 2012, Mayan calendar was there to hide this fact…

 https://docs.google.com/file/d/1F7YHvrsRCfKnj4IXL47eAwoFHwlUn8asNhGwNA6RYbCu8UP7aBrVbEmlR-TR/edit?usp=sharing

there is an absolute time limitation, as before…

…Upon the filing of such certificate with the Comptroller of the Currency as aforesaid, the said Federal reserve bank shall become a

https://docs.google.com/open?id=1F7YHvrsRCfKnj4IXL47eAwoFHwlUn8asNhGwNA6RYbCu8UP7aBrVbEmlR-TR


http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/363/lund.pdf

In any case, the FED is working against the real good of nearly all citizens, they do not follow the duties they should follow and the charter ot the franchise GIVEN for nearly nothing, inducing huge taxes for most of us the living. 

Just think of the real value of every dollar, going to nearly zero… Since the Fed’s creation in 1913 the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value

They create billions and quadrillions for a private organization and for private interests under an RICO and  a PONZI scheme. Read the audit, it is just disgusting.

Audit the Federal Reserve

1925 Responses

You are viewing the 2009/2010 version of the Audit the Fed page. Please click here for the 2011/2012 version or read on for the amazing history of Ron Paul’s efforts to bring transparency to the secretive banking cartel.

The Federal Reserve is the chief culprit behind the economic crisis. Its unchecked power to create endless amounts of money out of thin air brought us the boom and bust cycle and causes one financial bubble after another. Since the Fed’s creation in 1913 the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value,
and by recklessly inflating the money supply the Fed continues to
distort interest rates and intentionally erodes the value of the dollar.

For the past 30 years, Congressman Ron Paul has worked tirelessly to
bring much-needed transparency and accountability to the secretive bank.
And in 2009 and 2010 his unfaltering dedication showed astonishing
results: HR 1207, the bill to audit the Federal Reserve, swept the country and made the central bankers shudder at their desks. The bill passed as an amendment both in the House Financial Services Committee and in the House itself.

But the usurpers of America’s future didn’t take it lying down. They
weren’t about to allow their secrets to be exposed and their magic
money machine to be put under close scrutiny. They worked frantically behind the scenes to quietly derail all efforts to open up the Federal Reserve to an independent audit.

A handful of Fed-loving U.S. senators led by Chris Dodd rewrote the
Senate version of the Financial Reform Bill to strip out Ron Paul’s
Audit the Fed amendment and actually expand the Fed’s power over banks, lending and money. As Alan Grayson pointed out here, and Ron Paul commented on here, the Dodd bill completely eliminated legislation to audit the Federal Reserve, which had already passed in the House.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced an amendment
on the floor effectively adding the Grayson-Paul language to the Senate
bill, but later changed his amendment under pressure by the Federal
Reserve and the Obama administration. The altered Sanders amendment passed the Senate on May 11, 2010 by a unanimous 96-0 vote.

Sen. Vitter reintroduced an amendment with the original Audit the Fed language. The Senate rejected the amendment on May 11, 2010 by a 37-62 vote.

The House and Senate went to the conference committee
which attempted to reconcile the differences between the two bills (and
their amendments). Unfortunately, Ron Paul’s tough language ended up
not being included in the final bill.

On June 30, 2010, the GOP introduced Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill as
a motion to recommit, which was the last chance to alter the financial
regulation bill. Audit the Fed failed by a vote of 229-198.
All Republicans voted in favor of the measure with 23 Democrats
crossing the aisle to vote with Republicans. 114 co-sponsors of HR 1207,
all Democrats, jumped ship and voted against Audit the Fed.

But let’s start from the beginning. Here’s the fascinating history of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill:

02/2009: Ron Paul introduces bill to Audit the Federal Reserve

On February 26, 2009, Ron Paul introduced HR 1207, the bill to audit the Federal Reserve:

“I rise to introduce the Federal Reserve Transparency
Act. Throughout its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has
presided over the near-complete destruction of the United States dollar.
Since 1913 the dollar has lost over 95% of its purchasing power, aided
and abetted by the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy. How long
will we as a Congress stand idly by while hard-working Americans see
their savings eaten away by inflation? Only big-spending politicians and
politically favored bankers benefit from inflation.”

After a groundswell of grassroots support, HR 1207 and its
counterpart in the Senate, S 604, went on to attract 320 and 32
co-sponsors respectively.

10/2009: Mel Watt Introduces Competing Placebo Amendment

With HR 1207 gaining momentum, Congressman Mel Watt introduced a competing banker-approved “placebo” amendment that would have replaced HR 1207 and actually increased the Federal Reserve’s secrecy.

11/2009: Victory over Mel Watt Amendment

On November 19, 2009, after a historic debate lasting several hours, Ron Paul’s and Alan Grayson’s “Audit the Fed” amendment passed 43-26 in the House Financial Services Committee.
The amendment called for a comprehensive audit of the Federal Reserve
and replaced the opposing “placebo” amendment proposed by Mel Watt.

How they voted on Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed amendment (HR 1207 co-sponsors in bold):

Note: Due to a clerical error, until 5/26/2010 this roll call
erroneously listed Rep. Gary Miller (CA-42) as a Democrat who supposedly
voted “nay”. However, the reality is that Rep. Miller is a Republican
who was absent on the day of the vote. He is a co-sponsor of HR 1207. We
apologize!

Democrats
MA-04	Rep. Barney Frank		nay
PA-11	Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski		nay
CA-35	Rep. Maxine Waters		nay
NY-14	Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney		nay
IL-04	Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez		nay
NY-12	Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez		nay
NC-12	Rep. Melvin L. Watt		nay
NY-05	Rep. Gary L. Ackerman		nay
CA-27	Rep. Brad Sherman	aye
NY-06	Rep. Gregory W. Meeks		nay
KS-03	Rep. Dennis Moore		nay
MA-08	Rep. Michael E. Capuano		nay
TX-15	Rep. Rubén Hinojosa	aye
MO-01	Rep. William Lacy Clay	aye
NY-04	Rep. Carolyn McCarthy		nay
CA-43	Rep. Joe Baca
MA-09	Rep. Stephen F. Lynch		nay
GA-13	Rep. David Scott	aye
TX-09	Rep. Al Green		nay
MO-05	Rep. Emanuel Cleaver		nay
IL-08	Rep. Melissa L. Bean		nay
WI-04	Rep. Gwen Moore		nay
NH-02	Rep. Paul W. Hodes	aye
MN-05	Rep. Keith Ellison		nay
FL-22	Rep. Ron Klein		nay
OH-06	Rep. Charles Wilson		nay
CO-07	Rep. Ed Perlmutter	aye
IN-02	Rep. Joe Donnelly		nay
IL-14	Rep. Bill Foster		nay
IN-07	Rep. Andre Carson		nay
CA-12	Rep. Jackie Speier	aye
MS-01	Rep. Travis Childers	aye
ID-01	Rep. Walt Minnick	aye
NJ-03	Rep. John Adler	aye
OH-15	Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy		nay
OH-01	Rep. Steve Driehaus	aye
FL-24	Rep. Suzanne Kosmas	aye
FL-08	Rep. Alan Grayson	aye
CT-04	Rep. Jim Himes		nay
MI-09	Rep. Gary Peters	aye
NY-25	Rep. Dan Maffei	aye
Republicans
AL-06	Rep. Spencer Bachus	aye
TX-19	Rep. Randy Neugebauer	aye
DE-01	Rep. Michael N. Castle	aye
NY-03	Rep. Peter King	aye
CA-40	Rep. Edward R. Royce	aye
OK-03	Rep. Frank D. Lucas	aye
TX-14	Rep. Ron Paul (sponsor)	aye
IL-16	Rep. Donald A. Manzullo	aye
NC-03	Rep. Walter B. Jones	aye
IL-13	Rep. Judy Biggert	aye
NC-13	Rep. Brad Miller
WV-02	Rep. Shelley Moore Capito	aye
TX-05	Rep. Jeb Hensarling	aye
NJ-05	Rep. Scott Garrett	aye
SC-03	Rep. J. Gresham Barrett	aye
PA-06	Rep. Jim Gerlach	aye
GA-06	Rep. Tom Price	aye
NC-10	Rep. Patrick T. McHenry	aye
CA-48	Rep. John Campbell	aye
FL-12	Rep. Adam Putnam	aye
MN-06	Rep. Michele Bachmann	aye
TX-24	Rep. Kenny Marchant	aye
MI-11	Rep. Thaddeus McCotter	aye
CA-22	Rep. Kevin McCarthy	aye
FL-15	Rep. Bill Posey	aye
KS-02	Rep. Lynn Jenkins	aye
NY-26	Rep. Christopher Lee	aye
MN-03	Rep. Erik Paulsen	aye
NJ-07	Rep. Leonard Lance	aye

12/2009: Audit the Fed Passes in the House

The Audit the Fed amendment was attached to Barney Frank’s HR 3996,
also known as the “Financial Stability Improvement Act of 2009″. That
bill was later combined, along with several other bills, into “The Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 – Financial Stability
Improvement Act of 2009″ (HR 4173). The House passed the new bill on December 11, 2009 on a vote of 223-202.

03/2010: Treasury Officials Still Support Mel Watt Amendment

On March 8, 2010 Huffington Post reporter Sam Stein participated in a bizarre meeting with unnamed high level treasury officials:

The Treasury Department is vigorously opposed to a
House-passed measure that would open the Federal Reserve to an audit by
the Government Accountability Office (GAO), a senior Treasury official
said Monday. Instead, the official said, the Treasury prefers a
substitute offered by Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.), and would like to see it
enacted as part of the Senate bill.

The Watt measure, however, while claiming to increase transparency,
actually puts new restrictions on the GAO’s ability to perform an audit.

03/2010: Mel Watt Amendment Used in Senate Version of the Financial Reform Bill

Ron Paul: “In the Senate, we didn’t get
enough strong support over there and the Republicans didn’t really fight
for it and at the Senate side it is not included. Matter of fact, they
have included Mel Watts’s language. His language and my language
competed in the House Financial Services Committee and of course we won
that pretty easily. But they inserted that in so Mel Watt and the
bankers were able to influence the senators enough to put their language
in there. So what probably will happen is the two bills will be passed.
It’ll be in one bill and not the other and then the fight will be to
put pressure on the conference to go with the House [bill] instead of
the Senate.”

04/2010: Bernie Sanders Introduces Audit the Fed Amendment in the Senate

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced an amendment on the floor effectively adding the Grayson-Paul language to the Senate bill.

05/2010: Bernie Sanders Sells Out, Senate Passes Watered Down Amendment

On May 6, 2010 Bernie Sanders sold out to the bankers
by modifying his amendment to the extent that it would allow the Fed to
keep many of its activities secret. On May 11, 2010 the Sanders
amendment passed the Senate by a unanimous 96-0 vote.

05/2010: David Vitter Comes To The Rescue But His Amendment is Defeated

Sen. David Vitter reintroduced an amendment with Ron Paul’s original Audit the Fed language. The Senate rejected the amendment on May 11, 2010 by a 37-62 vote.

06/2010: 114 Democrats Jump Ship and Vote Down Audit the Fed

On June 30, 2010, Ron Paul’s attempt to audit the Federal Reserve,
which was previously co-sponsored by 320 members of the House (HR 1207),
failed by a vote of 229-198. All Republicans voted in favor of the
measure with 23 Democrats crossing the aisle to vote with Republicans.
114 co-sponsors of HR 1207, all Democrats, jumped ship and voted against
Audit the Fed.

The GOP had offered the Fed audit as the minority’s last chance to
alter the financial regulation bill. The bill does have an watered-down
audit provision in the conference report, but it is limited to loans
made by the Fed during the height of the economic crisis. Ron Paul’s
bill would have allowed a total examination of the Fed’s books.

How they voted

Democrats, Republicans, HR 1207 Co-Sponsors

YEA

Aderholt Akin Alexander Austria Bachmann Bachus Barrett (SC) Bartlett Barton (TX) Biggert Bilbray Bilirakis Blackburn Blunt Boehner Bonner Bono Mack Boozman Boucher Boustany Brady (TX) Broun (GA) Brown (SC) Brown-Waite, Ginny Buchanan Burgess Burton (IN) Buyer Calvert Camp Campbell Cantor Cao Capito Carney Carter Cassidy Castle Chaffetz Childers Coble Coffman (CO) Cole Conaway Crenshaw Critz Culberson Davis (KY) Dent Diaz-Balart, L. Diaz-Balart, M. Djou Dreier Duncan Edwards (TX) Ehlers Emerson Fallin Flake Fleming Forbes Fortenberry Foxx Franks (AZ) Frelinghuysen Gallegly

Garrett (NJ) Gerlach Giffords Gingrey (GA) Gohmert Goodlatte Granger Graves (GA) Graves (MO) Grayson Griffith Guthrie Hall (TX) Harper Hastings (WA) Heller Hensarling Herger Hodes Hoekstra Hunter Inglis Issa Jenkins Johnson (IL) Johnson, Sam Jones Jordan (OH) King (IA) King (NY) Kingston Kirk Kirkpatrick (AZ) Kline (MN) Kratovil Lamborn Lance Latham LaTourette Latta Lee (NY) Lewis (CA) Linder Lipinski LoBiondo Lucas Luetkemeyer Lummis Lungren, Daniel E. Mack Manzullo Marchant Markey (CO) McCarthy (CA) McCaul McClintock McCotter McHenry McIntyre McKeon McMorris Rodgers McNerney Mica Miller (FL) Miller (MI) Miller, Gary

Minnick Mitchell Moran (KS) Murphy, Tim Myrick Neugebauer Nunes Nye Olson Paul Paulsen Pence Perriello Petri Pitts Platts Poe (TX) Posey Price (GA) Putnam Radanovich Rehberg Reichert Roe (TN) Rogers (AL) Rogers (KY) Rogers (MI) Rohrabacher Rooney Ros-Lehtinen Roskam Ross Royce Ryan (WI) Scalise Schmidt Schock Sensenbrenner Sessions Shadegg Shimkus Shuster Simpson Skelton Smith (NE) Smith (NJ) Smith (TX) Space Stearns Sullivan Teague Terry Thompson (PA) Thornberry Tiahrt Tiberi Titus Turner Upton Walden Westmoreland Whitfield Wilson (SC) Wittman Wolf Young (FL)

NAY

Ackerman Adler (NJ) Altmire Andrews Arcuri Baca Baird Baldwin Barrow Bean Becerra Berkley Berman Berry Bishop (GA) Bishop (NY) Blumenauer Boccieri Boren Boswell Boyd Brady (PA) Braley (IA) Bright Brown, Corrine Butterfield Capps Capuano Cardoza Carnahan Carson (IN) Castor (FL) Chandler Chu Clarke Clay Cleaver Clyburn Cohen Connolly (VA) Conyers Cooper Costa Costello Courtney Crowley Cuellar Cummings Dahlkemper Davis (AL) Davis (CA) Davis (IL) Davis (TN) DeFazio DeGette Delahunt DeLauro Deutch Dicks Dingell Doggett Donnelly (IN) Doyle Driehaus Edwards (MD) Ellison Ellsworth Engel Eshoo Etheridge Farr Fattah Filner Foster Frank (MA) Fudge Garamendi

Gonzalez Gordon (TN) Green, Al Green, Gene Grijalva Gutierrez Hall (NY) Halvorson Hare Harman Hastings (FL) Heinrich Herseth Sandlin Higgins Hill Himes Hinchey Hinojosa Hirono Holden Holt Honda Hoyer Inslee Isra-el Jackson (IL) Jackson Lee (TX) Johnson (GA) Johnson, E. B. Kagen Kanjorski Kaptur Kennedy Kildee Kilpatrick (MI) Kilroy Kind Kissell Klein (FL) Kosmas Kucinich Langevin Larsen (WA) Larson (CT) Lee (CA) Levin Lewis (GA) Loebsack Lofgren, Zoe Lowey Luján Lynch Maffei Maloney Markey (MA) Marshall Matheson Matsui McCarthy (NY) McCollum McDermott McGovern McMahon Meek (FL) Meeks (NY) Melancon Michaud Miller (NC) Miller, George Mollohan Moore (KS) Moore (WI) Moran (VA) Murphy (CT) Murphy (NY) Murphy, Patrick Nadler (NY)

Napolitano Neal (MA) Oberstar Obey Olver Ortiz Owens Pallone Pascrell Pastor (AZ) Payne Perlmutter Peters Peterson Pingree (ME) Polis (CO) Pomeroy Price (NC) Quigley Rahall Rangel Reyes Richardson Rodriguez Rothman (NJ) Roybal-Allard Ruppersberger Rush Ryan (OH) Salazar Sánchez, Linda T. Sanchez, Loretta Sarbanes Schakowsky Schauer Schiff Schrader Schwartz Scott (GA) Scott (VA) Serrano Sestak Shea-Porter Sherman Shuler Sires Slaughter Smith (WA) Snyder Speier Spratt Stark Stupak Sutton Tanner Thompson (CA) Thompson (MS) Tierney Tonko Towns Tsongas Van Hollen Velázquez Visclosky Walz Wasserman Schultz Waters Watson Watt Waxman Weiner Welch Wilson (OH) Wu Yarmuth

Not Voting

Bishop (UT)
Taylor
Wamp
Woolsey
Young (AK)

THE END? Not yet! Audit the Fed will be back in 2011.

(The information below covers the original HR 1207 and S 604 bills.)

Ron Paul’s bill to audit the Federal Reserve (HR 1207)
now has 320 co-sponsors, and the numbers keep growing! HR 1207′s
companion bill in the Senate, S 604, has already attracted 32
co-sponsors.

This is history in the making, and victory is within reach. Imagine what will happen if HR 1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, comes up for vote in Congress! With two thirds of the House of Representatives already co-sponsoring this bill,
it has real potential to pass — BUT only if we educate and rally the
people to support it and get our Congresspeople to put it to vote and
pass it.

HR 1207 Co-Sponsors

Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] – 2/26/2009
Rep Aderholt, Robert B. [AL-4] – 5/6/2009
Rep Adler, John H. [NJ-3] – 5/6/2009
Rep Akin, W. Todd [MO-2] – 3/19/2009
Rep Alexander, Rodney [LA-5] – 3/10/2009
Rep Altmire, Jason [PA-4] – 5/20/2009
Rep Arcuri, Michael A. [NY-24] – 9/23/2009
Rep Austria, Steve [OH-7] – 5/6/2009
Rep Bachmann, Michele [MN-6] – 2/26/2009
Rep Bachus, Spencer [AL-6] – 4/29/2009
Rep Baird, Brian [WA-3] – 7/10/2009
Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] – 4/21/2009
Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] – 4/28/2009
Rep Barrow, John [GA-12] – 5/12/2009
Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] – 2/26/2009
Rep Barton, Joe [TX-6] – 5/4/2009
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] – 5/21/2009
Rep Berry, Marion [AR-1] – 5/20/2009
Rep Biggert, Judy [IL-13] – 4/28/2009
Rep Bilbray, Brian P. [CA-50] – 4/21/2009
Rep Bilirakis, Gus M. [FL-9] – 5/4/2009
Rep Bishop, Rob [UT-1] – 4/21/2009
Rep Bishop, Sanford D., Jr. [GA-2] – 10/27/2009
Rep Bishop, Timothy H. [NY-1] – 7/10/2009
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] – 3/16/2009
Rep Blunt, Roy [MO-7] – 3/24/2009
Rep Boccieri, John A. [OH-16] – 7/28/2009
Rep Boehner, John A. [OH-8] – 6/10/2009
Rep Bonner, Jo [AL-1] – 6/9/2009
Rep Bono Mack, Mary [CA-45] – 4/29/2009
Rep Boozman, John [AR-3] – 5/7/2009
Rep Boren, Dan [OK-2] – 12/1/2009
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3] – 6/9/2009
Rep Boucher, Rick [VA-9] – 7/20/2009
Rep Boustany, Charles W., Jr. [LA-7] – 5/13/2009
Rep Boyd, Allen [FL-2] – 7/14/2009
Rep Brady, Kevin [TX-8] – 4/22/2009
Rep Braley, Bruce L. [IA-1] – 6/11/2009
Rep Bright, Bobby [AL-2] – 6/11/2009
Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] – 2/26/2009
Rep Brown, Corrine [FL-3] – 6/11/2009
Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC-1] – 4/28/2009
Rep Brown-Waite, Ginny [FL-5] – 5/20/2009
Rep Buchanan, Vern [FL-13] – 3/17/2009
Rep Burgess, Michael C. [TX-26] – 3/19/2009
Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5] – 2/26/2009
Rep Buyer, Steve [IN-4] – 4/30/2009
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] – 4/29/2009
Rep Camp, Dave [MI-4] – 6/18/2009
Rep Campbell, John [CA-48] – 5/4/2009
Rep Cantor, Eric [VA-7] – 6/23/2009
Rep Cao, Anh “Joseph” [LA-2] – 6/11/2009
Rep Capito, Shelley Moore [WV-2] – 4/1/2009
Rep Carney, Christopher P. [PA-10] – 6/9/2009
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] – 3/31/2009
Rep Cassidy, Bill [LA-6] – 5/4/2009
Rep Castle, Michael N. [DE] – 3/17/2009
Rep Chaffetz, Jason [UT-3] – 3/6/2009
Rep Chandler, Ben [KY-6] – 7/7/2009
Rep Childers, Travis [MS-1] – 6/9/2009
Rep Chu, Judy [CA-32] – 10/6/2009
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] – 11/19/2009
Rep Coble, Howard [NC-6] – 6/11/2009
Rep Coffman, Mike [CO-6] – 6/16/2009
Rep Cohen, Steve [TN-9] – 10/22/2009
Rep Cole, Tom [OK-4] – 4/21/2009
Rep Conaway, K. Michael [TX-11] – 5/7/2009
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] – 6/23/2009
Rep Courtney, Joe [CT-2] – 7/8/2009
Rep Crenshaw, Ander [FL-4] – 5/4/2009
Rep Cuellar, Henry [TX-28] – 9/24/2009
Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] – 3/26/2009
Rep Dahlkemper, Kathleen A. [PA-3] – 7/22/2009
Rep Davis, Danny K. [IL-7] – 6/26/2009
Rep Davis, Geoff [KY-4] – 5/6/2009
Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4] – 9/30/2009
Rep Deal, Nathan [GA-9] – 3/23/2009
Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] – 3/9/2009
Rep Delahunt, Bill [MA-10] – 9/9/2009
Rep Dent, Charles W. [PA-15] – 5/6/2009
Rep Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [FL-21] – 7/10/2009
Rep Diaz-Balart, Mario [FL-25] – 6/18/2009
Rep Doggett, Lloyd [TX-25] – 4/21/2009
Rep Doyle, Michael F. [PA-14] – 9/29/2009
Rep Dreier, David [CA-26] – 6/10/2009
Rep Driehaus, Steve [OH-1] – 10/6/2009
Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] – 3/6/2009
Rep Edwards, Chet [TX-17] – 6/16/2009
Rep Edwards, Donna F. [MD-4] – 6/11/2009
Rep Ehlers, Vernon J. [MI-3] – 4/21/2009
Rep Emerson, Jo Ann [MO-8] – 7/15/2009
Rep Fallin, Mary [OK-5] – 4/2/2009
Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] – 7/8/2009
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] – 7/28/2009
Rep Flake, Jeff [AZ-6] – 5/11/2009
Rep Fleming, John [LA-4] – 3/18/2009
Rep Forbes, J. Randy [VA-4] – 5/20/2009
Rep Fortenberry, Jeff [NE-1] – 5/12/2009
Rep Foxx, Virginia [NC-5] – 3/10/2009
Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2] – 3/23/2009
Rep Frelinghuysen, Rodney P. [NJ-11] – 6/3/2009
Rep Fudge, Marcia L. [OH-11] – 7/9/2009
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] – 7/7/2009
Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] – 3/5/2009
Rep Gerlach, Jim [PA-6] – 5/11/2009
Rep Giffords, Gabrielle [AZ-8] – 6/16/2009
Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11] – 3/30/2009
Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] – 4/23/2009
Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6] – 4/28/2009
Rep Gordon, Bart [TN-6] – 9/8/2009
Rep Granger, Kay [TX-12] – 4/28/2009
Rep Graves, Sam [MO-6] – 4/22/2009
Rep Graves, Tom [GA-9] – 6/17/2010
Rep Grayson, Alan [FL-8] – 3/11/2009
Rep Griffith, Parker [AL-5] – 6/16/2009
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] – 6/3/2009
Rep Guthrie, Brett [KY-2] – 5/7/2009
Rep Hall, Ralph M. [TX-4] – 4/29/2009
Rep Halvorson, Deborah L. [IL-11] – 6/3/2009
Rep Hare, Phil [IL-17] – 5/11/2009
Rep Harman, Jane [CA-36] – 7/7/2009
Rep Harper, Gregg [MS-3] – 5/11/2009
Rep Hastings, Doc [WA-4] – 5/11/2009
Rep Heinrich, Martin [NM-1] – 11/2/2009
Rep Heller, Dean [NV-2] – 3/6/2009
Rep Hensarling, Jeb [TX-5] – 5/4/2009
Rep Herger, Wally [CA-2] – 4/21/2009
Rep Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie [SD] – 5/6/2009
Rep Higgins, Brian [NY-27] – 10/13/2009
Rep Hill, Baron P. [IN-9] – 10/22/2009
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. [NY-22] – 6/2/2009
Rep Hinojosa, Ruben [TX-15] – 9/10/2009
Rep Hirono, Mazie K. [HI-2] – 7/8/2009
Rep Hoekstra, Peter [MI-2] – 4/28/2009
Rep Holden, Tim [PA-17] – 6/4/2009
Rep Hunter, Duncan D. [CA-52] – 5/13/2009
Rep Inglis, Bob [SC-4] – 4/23/2009
Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] – 5/12/2009
Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49] – 6/16/2009
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] – 7/30/2009
Rep Jenkins, Lynn [KS-2] – 4/23/2009
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice [TX-30] – 9/15/2009
Rep Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [GA-4] – 6/9/2009
Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3] – 4/22/2009
Rep Johnson, Timothy V. [IL-15] – 4/23/2009
Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] – 2/26/2009
Rep Jordan, Jim [OH-4] – 6/2/2009
Rep Kagen, Steve [WI-8] – 2/26/2009
Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9] – 4/23/2009
Rep Kildee, Dale E. [MI-5] – 9/21/2009
Rep Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [MI-13] – 12/1/2009
Rep King, Peter T. [NY-3] – 6/4/2009
Rep King, Steve [IA-5] – 6/11/2009
Rep Kingston, Jack [GA-1] – 3/6/2009
Rep Kirk, Mark Steven [IL-10] – 7/15/2009
Rep Kirkpatrick, Ann [AZ-1] – 7/14/2009
Rep Kissell, Larry [NC-8] – 11/5/2009
Rep Kline, John [MN-2] – 4/29/2009
Rep Kosmas, Suzanne M. [FL-24] – 6/17/2009
Rep Kratovil, Frank, Jr. [MD-1] – 6/4/2009
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10] – 6/11/2009
Rep Lamborn, Doug [CO-5] – 4/21/2009
Rep Lance, Leonard [NJ-7] – 5/11/2009
Rep Langevin, James R. [RI-2] – 9/8/2009
Rep Latham, Tom [IA-4] – 4/21/2009
Rep LaTourette, Steven C. [OH-14] – 4/28/2009
Rep Latta, Robert E. [OH-5] – 5/20/2009
Rep Lee, Christopher J. [NY-26] – 6/10/2009
Rep Lewis, Jerry [CA-41] – 6/24/2009
Rep Lewis, John [GA-5] – 9/23/2009
Rep Linder, John [GA-7] – 5/6/2009
Rep Lipinski, Daniel [IL-3] – 6/4/2009
Rep LoBiondo, Frank A. [NJ-2] – 5/4/2009
Rep Loebsack, David [IA-2] – 6/10/2009
Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16] – 7/7/2009
Rep Lucas, Frank D. [OK-3] – 4/21/2009
Rep Luetkemeyer, Blaine [MO-9] – 4/21/2009
Rep Lujan, Ben Ray [NM-3] – 11/19/2009
Rep Lummis, Cynthia M. [WY] – 3/19/2009
Rep Lungren, Daniel E. [CA-3] – 5/7/2009
Rep Mack, Connie [FL-14] – 5/12/2009
Rep Maffei, Daniel B. [NY-25] – 5/12/2009
Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16] – 4/21/2009
Rep Marchant, Kenny [TX-24] – 3/11/2009
Rep Markey, Betsy [CO-4] – 6/25/2009
Rep Massa, Eric J. J. [NY-29] – 4/22/2009
Rep McCarthy, Kevin [CA-22] – 5/4/2009
Rep McCaul, Michael T. [TX-10] – 4/21/2009
Rep McClintock, Tom [CA-4] – 3/6/2009
Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] – 3/19/2009
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] – 4/29/2009
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3] – 6/10/2009
Rep McHenry, Patrick T. [NC-10] – 4/30/2009
Rep McHugh, John M. [NY-23] – 5/4/2009
Rep McIntyre, Mike [NC-7] – 6/10/2009
Rep McKeon, Howard P. “Buck” [CA-25] – 6/11/2009
Rep McMorris Rodgers, Cathy [WA-5] – 5/4/2009
Rep McNerney, Jerry [CA-11] – 3/16/2010
Rep Melancon, Charlie [LA-3] – 7/10/2009
Rep Mica, John L. [FL-7] – 5/12/2009
Rep Michaud, Michael H. [ME-2] – 5/7/2009
Rep Miller, Brad [NC-13] – 9/22/2009
Rep Miller, Candice S. [MI-10] – 4/28/2009
Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42] – 6/10/2009
Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] – 3/24/2009
Rep Minnick, Walter [ID-1] – 5/13/2009
Rep Mitchell, Harry E. [AZ-5] – 6/9/2009
Rep Moran, Jerry [KS-1] – 5/4/2009
Rep Murphy, Christopher S. [CT-5] – 7/7/2009
Rep Murphy, Patrick J. [PA-8] – 6/9/2009
Rep Murphy, Scott [NY-20] – 7/9/2009
Rep Murphy, Tim [PA-18] – 4/29/2009
Rep Myrick, Sue Wilkins [NC-9] – 4/28/2009
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] – 9/10/2009
Rep Neugebauer, Randy [TX-19] – 4/30/2009
Rep Nunes, Devin [CA-21] – 6/12/2009
Rep Nye, Glenn C., III [VA-2] – 9/17/2009
Rep Oberstar, James L. [MN-8] – 7/31/2009
Rep Olson, Pete [TX-22] – 4/21/2009
Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. [TX-27] – 5/14/2009
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-8] – 6/9/2009
Rep Pastor, Ed [AZ-4] – 5/20/2009
Rep Paulsen, Erik [MN-3] – 3/30/2009
Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10] – 7/30/2009
Rep Pence, Mike [IN-6] – 4/21/2009
Rep Perlmutter, Ed [CO-7] – 6/10/2009
Rep Perriello, Thomas S.P. [VA-5] – 5/13/2009
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] – 3/19/2009
Rep Petri, Thomas E. [WI-6] – 3/10/2009
Rep Pingree, Chellie [ME-1] – 10/6/2009
Rep Pitts, Joseph R. [PA-16] – 4/28/2009
Rep Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] – 3/19/2009
Rep Poe, Ted [TX-2] – 2/26/2009
Rep Polis, Jared [CO-2] – 6/11/2009
Rep Posey, Bill [FL-15] – 2/26/2009
Rep Price, Tom [GA-6] – 3/10/2009
Rep Putnam, Adam H. [FL-12] – 4/28/2009
Rep Quigley, Mike [IL-5] – 3/9/2010
Rep Radanovich, George [CA-19] – 5/6/2009
Rep Rehberg, Denny [MT] – 2/26/2009
Rep Reichert, David G. [WA-8] – 5/20/2009
Rep Reyes, Silvestre [TX-16] – 12/1/2009
Rep Richardson, Laura [CA-37] – 7/28/2009
Rep Rodriguez, Ciro D. [TX-23] – 12/1/2009
Rep Roe, David P. [TN-1] – 4/21/2009
Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] – 7/14/2009
Rep Rogers, Mike D. [AL-3] – 5/13/2009
Rep Rogers, Mike J. [MI-8] – 5/20/2009
Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [CA-46] – 3/6/2009
Rep Rooney, Thomas J. [FL-16] – 4/22/2009
Rep Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana [FL-18] – 4/28/2009
Rep Roskam, Peter J. [IL-6] – 6/2/2009
Rep Ross, Mike [AR-4] – 5/21/2009
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] – 6/18/2009
Rep Royce, Edward R. [CA-40] – 5/12/2009
Rep Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch [MD-2] – 10/20/2009
Rep Ryan, Paul [WI-1] – 5/14/2009
Rep Ryan, Tim [OH-17] – 10/23/2009
Rep Salazar, John T. [CO-3] – 7/15/2009
Rep Sarbanes, John P. [MD-3] – 6/15/2009
Rep Scalise, Steve [LA-1] – 5/20/2009
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] – 5/6/2009
Rep Schauer, Mark H. [MI-7] – 5/20/2009
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] – 7/14/2009
Rep Schmidt, Jean [OH-2] – 6/11/2009
Rep Schock, Aaron [IL-18] – 5/6/2009
Rep Schrader, Kurt [OR-5] – 9/15/2009
Rep Scott, David [GA-13] – 7/20/2009
Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. [WI-5] – 5/7/2009
Rep Sessions, Pete [TX-32] – 3/23/2009
Rep Shadegg, John B. [AZ-3] – 5/7/2009
Rep Shea-Porter, Carol [NH-1] – 6/9/2009
Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27] – 6/23/2009
Rep Shimkus, John [IL-19] – 4/22/2009
Rep Shuler, Heath [NC-11] – 6/12/2009
Rep Shuster, Bill [PA-9] – 5/7/2009
Rep Simpson, Michael K. [ID-2] – 4/28/2009
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [NY-28] – 6/17/2009
Rep Smith, Adam [WA-9] – 4/22/2009
Rep Smith, Adrian [NE-3] – 4/28/2009
Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4] – 6/15/2009
Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] – 4/2/2009
Rep Snyder, Vic [AR-2] – 6/23/2009
Rep Souder, Mark E. [IN-3] – 6/16/2009
Rep Space, Zachary T. [OH-18] – 6/23/2009
Rep Speier, Jackie [CA-12] – 6/11/2009
Rep Spratt, John M., Jr. [SC-5] – 10/13/2009
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] – 3/26/2009
Rep Stearns, Cliff [FL-6] – 3/6/2009
Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1] – 7/8/2009
Rep Sutton, Betty [OH-13] – 10/6/2009
Rep Taylor, Gene [MS-4] – 3/6/2009
Rep Teague, Harry [NM-2] – 6/12/2009
Rep Terry, Lee [NE-2] – 3/30/2009
Rep Thompson, Bennie G. [MS-2] – 7/17/2009
Rep Thompson, Glenn [PA-5] – 4/22/2009
Rep Thornberry, Mac [TX-13] – 5/21/2009
Rep Tiahrt, Todd [KS-4] – 4/28/2009
Rep Tiberi, Patrick J. [OH-12] – 4/28/2009
Rep Tierney, John F. [MA-6] – 7/20/2009
Rep Titus, Dina [NV-3] – 7/14/2009
Rep Tonko, Paul D. [NY-21] – 6/9/2009
Rep Turner, Michael R. [OH-3] – 5/13/2009
Rep Upton, Fred [MI-6] – 4/29/2009
Rep Visclosky, Peter J. [IN-1] – 7/20/2009
Rep Walden, Greg [OR-2] – 5/4/2009
Rep Walz, Timothy J. [MN-1] – 5/7/2009
Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3] – 3/16/2009
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] – 11/5/2009
Rep Welch, Peter [VT] – 5/21/2009
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] – 4/2/2009
Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1] – 5/14/2009
Rep Wilson, Joe [SC-2] – 4/29/2009
Rep Wittman, Robert J. [VA-1] – 4/1/2009
Rep Wolf, Frank R. [VA-10] – 6/11/2009
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] – 2/26/2009
Rep Wu, David [OR-1] – 7/13/2009
Rep Yarmuth, John A. [KY-3] – 7/14/2009
Rep Young, C.W. Bill [FL-10] – 6/3/2009
Rep Young, Don [AK] – 3/6/2009

Step 2: Your Senator

HR 1207′s identical companion bill in the Senate is known as S 604, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders.

S 604 Co-Sponsors

Sen Barrasso, John [WY] – 7/15/2009
Sen Bennett, Robert F. [UT] – 7/15/2009
Sen Boxer, Barbara [CA] – 9/17/2009
Sen Brownback, Sam [KS] – 7/8/2009
Sen Burr, Richard [NC] – 7/9/2009
Sen Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD] – 7/28/2009
Sen Chambliss, Saxby [GA] – 7/8/2009
Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – 7/20/2009
Sen Cochran, Thad [MS] – 10/1/2009
Sen Cornyn, John [TX] – 7/20/2009
Sen Crapo, Mike [ID] – 6/25/2009
Sen DeMint, Jim [SC] – 6/11/2009
Sen Dorgan, Byron L. [ND] – 9/9/2009
Sen Feingold, Russell D. [WI] – 7/15/2009
Sen Graham, Lindsey [SC] – 7/24/2009
Sen Grassley, Chuck [IA] – 8/3/2009
Sen Harkin, Tom [IA] – 7/20/2009
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] – 7/24/2009
Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] – 7/20/2009
Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK] – 7/9/2009
Sen Isakson, Johnny [GA] – 7/8/2009
Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA] – 12/17/2009
Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT] – 9/17/2009
Sen Lincoln, Blanche L. [AR] – 7/15/2009
Sen McCain, John [AZ] – 7/15/2009
Sen Murkowski, Lisa [AK] – 9/15/2009
Sen Risch, James E. [ID] – 8/3/2009
Sen Thune, John [SD] – 9/22/2009
Sen Vitter, David [LA] – 6/16/2009
Sen Webb, Jim [VA] – 8/3/2009
Sen Wicker, Roger F. [MS] – 10/1/2009
Sen Wyden, Ron [OR] – 1/28/2010

Step 3: The People

Tell everyone you know about HR 1207 and S 604 ask them to support the bills and to contact their representative as well. Link to this page and to CampaignForLiberty.com.

Link: http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/

Banner:

Why Audit The Federal Reserve?

Ron Paul’s legislation is aimed at pulling back the curtain from a
secretive and unaccountable Federal Reserve. Congress and the American
people have minimal, if any, oversight over trillions of dollars that
the Fed controls.

With recent bailouts and spending decisions shining a spotlight on
the actions of the Federal Reserve, more and more pressure is bearing
down on Congress to take action and demand accountability and
transparency.

Auditing the Fed is only the first step towards exposing this
antiquated insider-run creature to the powerful forces of free-market
competition. Once there are viable alternatives to the monopolistic fiat
dollar, the Federal Reserve will have to become honest and transparent
if it wants to remain in business.

Introducing HR 1207

Ron Paul introduced bill H.R. 1207 on February 26, 2009 with the following speech to Congress:

Madame Speaker,

I rise to introduce the Federal Reserve Transparency Act. Throughout
its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the
near-complete destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the
dollar has lost over 95% of its purchasing power, aided and abetted by
the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy. How long will we as a
Congress stand idly by while hard-working Americans see their savings
eaten away by inflation? Only big-spending politicians and politically
favored bankers benefit from inflation.

Serious discussion of proposals to oversee the Federal Reserve is
long overdue. I have been a longtime proponent of more effective
oversight and auditing of the Fed, but I was far from the first
Congressman to advocate these types of proposals. Esteemed former
members of the Banking Committee such as Chairmen Wright Patman and
Henry B. Gonzales were outspoken critics of the Fed and its lack of
transparency.

Since its inception, the Federal Reserve has always operated in the
shadows, without sufficient scrutiny or oversight of its operations.
While the conventional excuse is that this is intended to reduce the
Fed’s susceptibility to political pressures, the reality is that the Fed
acts as a foil for the government. Whenever you question the Fed about
the strength of the dollar, they will refer you to the Treasury, and
vice versa. The Federal Reserve has, on the one hand, many of the
privileges of government agencies, while retaining benefits of private
organizations, such as being insulated from Freedom of Information Act
requests.

The Federal Reserve can enter into agreements with foreign central
banks and foreign governments, and the GAO is prohibited from auditing
or even seeing these agreements. Why should a government-established
agency, whose police force has federal law enforcement powers, and whose
notes have legal tender status in this country, be allowed to enter
into agreements with foreign powers and foreign banking institutions
with no oversight? Particularly when hundreds of billions of dollars of
currency swaps have been announced and implemented, the Fed’s
negotiations with the European Central Bank, the Bank of International
Settlements, and other institutions should face increased scrutiny, most
especially because of their significant effect on foreign policy. If
the State Department were able to do this, it would be characterized as a
rogue agency and brought to heel, and if a private individual did this
he might face prosecution under the Logan Act, yet the Fed avoids both
fates.

More importantly, the Fed’s funding facilities and its agreements
with the Treasury should be reviewed. The Treasury’s supplementary
financing accounts that fund Fed facilities allow the Treasury to funnel
money to Wall Street without GAO or Congressional oversight. Additional
funding facilities, such as the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the
Term Securities Lending Facility, allow the Fed to keep financial asset
prices artificially inflated and subsidize poorly performing financial
firms.

The Federal Reserve Transparency Act would eliminate restrictions on
GAO audits of the Federal Reserve and open Fed operations to enhanced
scrutiny. We hear officials constantly lauding the benefits of
transparency and especially bemoaning the opacity of the Fed, its
monetary policy, and its funding facilities. By opening all Fed
operations to a GAO audit and calling for such an audit to be completed
by the end of 2010, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act would achieve
much-needed transparency of the Federal Reserve. I urge my colleagues to
support this bill.

HR 1207

This is the bill itself, H.R. 1207:

111th Congress – 1st Session

H.R. 1207

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the
Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such
audits are reported, and for other purposes.

1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009″.

SEC. 2. AUDIT REFORM AND TRANSPARENCY FOR THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM.

(a) IN GENERAL. – Subsection (b) of section 714 of title 31, United
States Code, is amended by striking all after “shall audit an agency”
and inserting a period.

(b) AUDIT. – Section 714 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(e) AUDIT AND REPORT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM. –

“(1) IN GENERAL. – The audit of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks under subsection (b) shall
be completed before the end of 2010.

“(2) REPORT –

“(A) REQUIRED. – A report on the audit referred to in paragraph (1)
shall be submitted by the Comptroller General to the Congress before the
end of the 90-day period beginning on the date on which such audit is
completed and made available to the Speaker of the House, the majority
and minority leaders of the House of Representatives, the majority and
minority leaders of the Senate, the Chairman and Ranking Member of the
committee and each sub-committee of jurisdiction in the House of
Representatives and the Senate, and any other Member of Congress who
requests it.

“(B) CONTENTS. – The report under subparagraph (A) shall include a
detailed description of the findings and conclusion of the Comptroller
General with respect to the audit that is the subject of the report,
together with such recommendations for legislative or administrative
action as the Comptroller General may determine to be appropriate.”.

Ron Paul’s Quotes on HR 1207

In this speech to Congress, Ron Paul refutes Ben Bernanke’s
interpretation of HR 1207, the bill to audit the Federal Reserve, and
explains why only an audit will protect the public’s interest.

Date: 7/30/2009

Ron Paul: Mr. Speaker, the big guns have
lined up against HR 1207, the bill to audit the Federal Reserve. What
is it that they are so concerned about? What information are they hiding
from the American people? The screed is: transparency is okay except
for those things they don’t want to be transparent.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, argues that HR 1207, the
legislation to audit the Federal Reserve, would politicize monetary
policy. He claims that monetary policy must remain independent, that is;
secret. He ignores history because chairmen of the Federal Reserve in
the past, especially when up for reappointment, do their best to
accommodate the president with politically driven low interest rates and
a bubble economy.

Former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Arthur Burns, when asked about
all the inflation he brought about in 1971 before Nixon’s reelection,
said that the Fed has to do what the president wants it to do, or it
would lose its independence. That about tells you everything.

Not by accident Chairman Burns strongly supported Nixon’s program of
wage and price controls the same year, but I guess that’s not political.
Is not making secret deals with the likes of Goldman Sachs,
international financial institutions, foreign governments and foreign
central banks politicizing monetary policy?

Bernanke argues that the knowledge that their discussions and
decisions will one day be scrutinized will compromise the freedom of the
Open Market Committee to pursue sound policy. If it is sound and honest
and serves no special interest, what’s the problem?

He claims that HR 1207 would give power to Congress to affect
monetary policy. He dreamt this up to instill fear, an old statist trick
to justify government power. HR 1207 does nothing of the sort. He
suggested that the day after an FOMC meeting, Congress could send in the
GAO to demand an audit of everything said and done. This is hardly the
case. The FOMC function under HR 1207 would not change.

The detailed transcripts of the FOMC meetings are released every 5
years, so why would this be so different and what is it that they don’t
want the American people to know? Is there something about the
transcripts that need to be kept secret, or are the transcripts actually
not verbatim?

Fed sycophants argue that an audit would destroy the financial
markets’ faith in the Fed. They say this in the midst of the greatest
financial crisis in history brought on by none other than the Federal
Reserve. In fact, Chairman Bernanke stated on November 14th 2007, “A
considerable amount of evidence indicates that Central Bank transparency
increases the effectiveness of monetary policy and enhances economic
and financial performance”.

They also argue that an audit would hurt the value of the U.S.
dollar. In fact, the Fed, in less than a 100 years of its existence, has
reduced the value of the 1914 dollar by 96%.

They claim HR 1207 would raise interest rates. How could it? The Fed
sets interest rates and the bill doesn’t interfere with monetary policy.
Congress would have no say in the matter and besides, Congress likes
low interest rates.

It is argued that the Fed wouldn’t be free to raise interest rates if
they thought it necessary. But Bernanke has already assured the
Congress that rates are going to stay low for the foreseeable future.
And again, this bill does nothing to allow Congress to interfere with
interest rate setting.

Fed supporters claim that they want to protect the public’s interest
with their secrecy. But the banks and Wall Streets are the opponents of
HR 1207, and the people are for it. Just who best represents the
public’s interest?

The real question is: why are Wall Street and the Fed so hysterically
opposed to HR 1207? Just what information are they so anxious to keep
secret? Only an audit of the Federal Reserve will answer these
questions.

Excerpt from Ron Paul’s 4/22/2009 appearance on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Freedom Watch:

Ron Paul: After we came back yesterday
from our 2-week break, I think have 15 new people signed on and somebody
came up to me and says, “I signed on your bill this morning because I
went to my town hall meetings, I went four of them and in every meeting
people were there and say, “It’s time that we have transparency of the
Fed.’”

But I call them the Fourth Branch of government. Some people don’t
think of them as part of the government because they’re so secretive.
But we created it, we can end it, we take no responsibility to supervise
it, and look at what they’re doing. We spend hundreds of billions, but
the Fed deals in trillions, and they don’t have any responsibility to
tell us about it. So there’s a lot of power there and it deserves
looking at.

And I think I have to say Barney Frank has been sympathetic with
this. He’s for transparency. He’s not for hard money and the type of
monetary policy I’m talking about. He believes that we should have more
transparency of the Fed, so whether this bill gets passed or something
very similar, the mood in the country is such that not only do they want
us to be better in handling the appropriated fund and knowing where
these TARP funds went, the American people have awakened to this whole
idea of what the Federal Reserve does behind the scenes.

So I’m delighted. I’ve been pushing this monetary issue for more than
30 years believing it was THE significant economic issue of our time,
and I think people are starting to realize this and we’re going to keep
hearing about it and there’s a good chance that it will eventually make
it to the floor.

Excerpt from Ron Paul’s 3/5/2009 appearance on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s Freedom Watch:

Judge Napolitano: Before we switch
gears, Congressman Paul, how did Ben Bernanke react to the legislation
that you introduced calling for an audit of the Fed. Did he give you a
call on the phone?

Ron Paul: Oh yes, he called me, wanted to
congratulate me and he wanted to support my bill. You know,
interestingly, just recently, I cannot name his name but I was talking
to a former member of the Federal Reserve board and told him about the
bill and he was friendly enough.

I said, “What do you think of that?” He said, “I think it’s not a
very good idea”. And I said, “Do the people at the Federal Reserve ever
talk about, are concerned about the dollar”. I said, you know, I’m
always talking about the dollar and what this is going to do to the
dollar. And I said, “Do they know that all this debt and inflation could
hurt the dollar?” He says, “Yes, they do.” He confirmed it. He said,
“They absolutely do.” He says, “But they can’t answer your questions in
public because it would cause panic.”

Judge Napolitano: This administration came to power
and we all knew the words that they used, “hope” and “change”. But one
of the words that they really used was “transparency”. I would think the
President himself should be in favor of transparency at the Fed if he
wants to be ideologically consistent. What are they afraid we will find
out, Congressman Paul?

Ron Paul: Well, what they’re going to find out is,
that’s the first step. Once we get the audit bill passed and we can
reveal what they are doing, I think the next step is to end the Fed.
That’s why they don’t want that.

You know, we had some very good comments made by our Senator Bernie
Sanders yesterday from Vermont. I talked with him this morning and we’re
going to be talking a lot about the need for having transparency.

And I think the mood is right. The mood is right both with the
Democrats and the Republicans, because they don’t know exactly what is
going on but they know the American people are sick and tired of just
throwing money out there, whether it’s to the Treasury and nobody knows
where it goes, whether they send it to Iraq and nobody knows where the
bundles of money go, or whether the Federal Reserve can create 2
trillion dollars, and they don’t even have to tell us.

As a government all onto itself, it’s bigger than the whole U.S.
Congress. They create trillions in a day, you know, in a short period of
time, and in the Congress we do talk a little bit when we pass 400
million or 800 million. But the Fed is a much bigger problem.

Excerpt from Ron Paul’s 3/10/2009 interview with Alex Jones:

Alex Jones: Every few weeks they come
before the banking committee and you bring up the fact that what they
are doing is destroying us. What do we need to do to bring the private
Federal Reserve under control?

Ron Paul: Well, there has to be an uprising by the
people. There has to be enough people who will demand that their
Congressmen respond, and that is building. You know, a year or two ago
nobody in Washington even thought about the Federal Reserve. Today there
is a lot more thinking going on and a lot more support for our
position. So it is growing. And yet, we’re not on the verge of changing
it. I have the bill to get rid of the Federal Reserve, that’s the major
step and the ultimate step and they’ll probably self-destruct before we
actually pass legislation.

But the bill that is more important in the short run is the auditing bill, the 1207
bill, because that means they have to start answering our questions.
Today they are protected. They are in total secrecy and they are
protected by the law. If 1207
is passed we have an audit and they have to answer the questions. And I
figure if we ever get that far and get the exposure and get the
transparency that we need, then people will wake up and realize, ‘why do
we have them at all?’

Alex Jones: Senator Sanders grilled them, as you know, last week saying that he is supporting 1207
or a version in the Senate because, Bernanke, the private Fed chief
just said, “I’m not going to tell you where the money, buddy.” I mean,
that’s amazing to see our elected Congress, the most powerful branch of
the government according to our founders, being told to kiss off.

Ron Paul: Right, and I know Sanders real well. He
was on the banking committee with me before he went into the Senate, and
I called him after that, and I believe he has now introduced my version
of the transparency bill and I’ve introduced his version. So both bills
exist. Mine is a little bit more conclusive, in that it removes the
total authority for them to not answer questions. His is specifically
designed to answer certain questions and reveal where certain trillion
dollars went. They are very similar, but somewhat different in nature,
so we both support each other’s bill and they’ve been introduced in both
chambers.

Alex Jones: Well, public support for this and the
majority of the Congress itself are saying they are angry, they don’t
know where the money is and Bloomberg sued to find out and he’s been
told No on their foyer. If this gets media attention I can see now way
that Congress wouldn’t vote for a proper audit of the private Federal
Reserve.

Ron Paul: They’re going to, if we can get it that
far. It’s a good issue, like so many of our issues, we bring different
many factions together, liberals and conservatives, under the
constitution. Because, if you’re a good honest liberal like Bernie
Sanders, he is an honest person but is very, very liberal. He calls
himself a socialist, but he agrees on the transparency issue.

So this whole idea that we expose them to bring populists,
libertarians, constitutionals, liberals, socialist all together and
think, “If we can’t do this, what’s left of representative government?
There’s nothing left.” So it’s a good unifier, I think it’s a great
issue.

Promote Audit the Fed